Workflow Efficiency
The primary reason to adopt a specific window manager is to improve your productivity. Look for tools that support keyboard-centric navigation. If you prefer to keep your hands on the home row, tiling managers that use custom keybindings to move, close, or resize windows will significantly reduce the time spent moving a mouse across a large 4K monitor.
Customization and Scripting
Flexibility is a hallmark of the Linux and Unix-like ecosystem. Some window managers, like Xmonad, allow you to write your configuration in a full programming language (Haskell), while others use simple text-based configuration files. Determine if you want a "set it and forget it" interface or a sandbox where you can script every aspect of the window behavior.
Display Protocol Compatibility
Modern Linux desktop computing is currently transitioning from the legacy X11 display server to the newer Wayland protocol. If you are building a new system, check whether the window manager supports Wayland natively (like Sway) or if it relies on X11 (like i3wm). Wayland support is increasingly important for modern hardware features like high-refresh-rate monitors and variable refresh rate (VRR) gaming.
Resource Consumption
If you are refurbishing older hardware, the "weight" of the window manager matters. Lightweight managers like Openbox consume minimal RAM and CPU cycles, whereas full-featured desktop environments like KDE Plasma or GNOME Shell—which include their own built-in window management—provide a more integrated, feature-rich experience at the cost of higher resource usage.